Originalmente publicado por
supercuerda
Porque no abandonas tu "Ingenieria para bobos" y agarras los planos en vez de jugar con fotitos y deducciones payasas...? Tenes todos los PDF del susodicho equipo y sus patentes a tu disposicion, revisa, analiza, lee y trata de obtener alguna conclusion tecnica que sirva al menos para saber de que corno estas hablando, dado que por lo que muestra la foto, da lo mismo que sea ESA ruedita a que sea un motor de 43 cilindros funcionando a cuerda

A ver, te referis a este PDF:
http://www.cheniere.org/references/MEG_Patent.pdf ?
A ver que te puedo decir, primero que nunca en mi vida vi una patente que en la primera pagina te intente vender sus libros. SI! la misma patente en su primer pagina hace publicidad de sus libros con sus precios, por ejemplo en la primer pagina de la patente podes ver:
Floyd Sweet Secrets DVD
Historic video, shot and narrated by
Tom Bearden, of Floyd Sweet’s
overunity device, the vacuum triode
amplifier. Part I (April 1987) covers
two bench tests of the units, which
output over one million times greater
power than was input; one was later
close-looped in completely selfpowering
operation. In Part II (May
1987), Sweet demonstrates his secret
technique for conditioning the magnets
employed in the device.
54 min. DVD – contemporaneous commentary by Tom Bearden $45
M.. por 45$ puedo multiplicar cualquier fuente de energia un millon de veces? mm esta patente me esta empezando a gustar.
Otra:
Weather engineering, freezing time, precursor robot wars, the
nature of mind, artificial life, mind conversion, EM disease
propagation – all are explained in this tour-de-force. It’s not scifi,
but what is really happening today – vital information you
won’t find anywhere else!
500 illustrations – 368 pp. – soft cover – 6x9" (15x23cm) $39
Mmm, mejor voy corriendo a buscar papel aluminio y me lo pongo en la cabeza..
Despues de la zarta de incoherencias de la patente hay al final una pagina llamada "ORDER FORM"
Please enclose check, money order or bank draft
in U.S. dollars payable to Thomas E. Bearden.
Amount enclosed: USD $__________
Mail to:
Cheniere Press
2827 Poso Flat Road
Bakersfield, CA 93308, U.S.A.
Donde podes encargar todos los libritos! jijijiji
Ahora hablando en serio, aunque es dificil con estos tipos:
Well, Ian wrote the United States Patent and Trademark Office about their granting of patent #6,362,718, back in May and June. An excerpt from his comprehensive letter reads: In granting US Patent 6,362,718, a United States federal agency is endorsing a claim of this kind being made. The four named inventors of the MEG may attempt to raise funds in the United States or other countries of the world, for the purposes of building new versions or production models of the device. In doing so, they may cite US Patent 6,362,718 as grounds that the MEG functions as stated. It is a matter for serious concern that the work of a federal agency of the United States of America may be used in this manner. Although I am not a US citizen myself, issues relating to patent law, commerce and science can cross national boundaries readily. By setting a precedent with US Patent 6,362,718, the USPTO is likely to face numerous patent applications for similar devices in the future, with every possibility of their being granted full US Patent status. Members of the public, not just in the United States of America but in other countries as well, need to be informed that devices of this kind will almost certainly not function as stated, if they are to make accurate business decisions relating to devices of this kind. In my opinion, the granting of US Patent 6,362,718 is an unhelpful development in this area. . . .
I trust that you will do everything in your power to ensure that the USPTO responds fully and speedily to the inquiry submitted by the James Randi Educational Foundation.
Ian was not expecting that he'd hear back from the USPTO; he knew that we at the JREF had received no response to our inquiries. But Lo! On August 22nd he received an answer from no less than Nicolas P. Godici, U.S. Commissioner for Patents! To get to the point directly, the following rewarding sentence appeared in the response from Commissioner Godici: After a careful review of the [MEG] patent, we are planning to issue a Director Ordered Reexamination.
Ah, but there's much more! When I communicated these glad tidings to Bob Park, he countered with a bombshell of his own: there will not only be a re-examination of the patent examiners, themselves, but the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office will now test and certify patent examiners on a regular basis and will change the way it recruits examiners! This was largely brought about by Park himself, though we at JREF like to feel that perhaps we had some effect somewhere along the road to this goal.... http://www.randi.org/jr/083002.html